Explore

Articles, art, music and code posted online have been used to train AI models, mostly without asking the people who made them. The case for Creators deserve a say, credit and a share when their work powers a commercial product. Without payment, AI could undercut the very artists and journalists it learned from. The case against Asking permission for every piece of public content is unworkable at internet scale. Licensing costs could leave AI in the hands of a few rich companies and slow down research. Where do you stand? Vote, then share your opinion - and say what would change your mind.

Most students now carry a tool that can write an essay or solve a maths problem in seconds. Schools are split between banning it and teaching with it. The case for AI can act as a patient personal tutor, especially for students who cannot afford tuition. Using AI well is a skill students will need at work, so schools should teach it rather than ban it. The case against Copying an answer skips the thinking that homework exists to build. Teachers can no longer tell what a student actually understands. Where do you stand? Vote, then share your opinion - and say what would change your mind.

Call centres, coding, design, accounting: AI tools already do parts of jobs that employ millions of Indians. At the same time, roles are appearing that did not exist five years ago. The case for New products and AI-assisted services can open up work at every skill level, from data annotation to AI operations. Cheaper AI tools can help small businesses and freelancers compete with much bigger firms. The case against Automation can replace routine work in IT services and BPO faster than people can retrain. New AI jobs may cluster in a few big cities and go mostly to people who already have degrees. Where do you stand? Vote, then share your opinion - and say what would change your mind.